Let’s say the cost of a compliance program is $12,000 per annum. Is that expensive?
The answer is contingent on what it is replacing.
Automating the collection of evidence across a complex technology-driven environment will eliminate hundreds of hours of repetitive work, it could be a well-spent amount of money. If a startup with seven employees could have the same proof in a couple of hours every month, the amount is quite different.
That’s a useful way to approach the search for a Vanta alternative. The question of which platform offers the most advanced features isn’t the first step. Think about what features help your business save time and energy.
Automated Manufacturing has a Break-Even Level
Automating compliance isn’t inherently good or bad. Scale changes its value. Imagine an expanding technology company with multiple cloud environments and many applications. The burden of manually collecting evidence constantly could be extremely heavy. Integrations that can automatically monitor systems and collect evidence may easily justify their expense.
Now think about a 10-person company that is preparing for its initial SOC 2. It may have a relatively small infrastructure, and the collection of evidence could be handled with minimal automation.
Vanta pricing is based upon this difference. The capabilities of a high-end platform are impressive, but they only provide financial value when a company requires them.
Compare Architecture and not just Brands
Searching for Vanta or Drata will quickly turn into an exercise of feature-by-feature. It is important to compare the services, features contract and quotes offered by each platform. Both are reputable systems for compliance that are focused on integrations and automation.
There’s another decision to make prior to that. Do you want to use an integration-driven compliance platform in any way? Some businesses favor continuous monitoring and automated evidence collection and automated evidence collection. Some companies prefer to collect evidence on their own.
Vanta Competitors Don’t Always Follow the Same Model
Many Vanta competitors are in a similar category that is focused on automation. There are also platforms with less cluttered designs that focus more on the system’s organization, rather as opposed to connectivity.
CertAssist belongs to the latter group. CertAssist was created by compliance consultants, internal auditors and other professionals, organizes controls frameworks in a central workspace. It lets you edit guidelines and policies for the auditing process, and allows auditors to review evidence via read-only access.
It does not connect to operating systems or install infrastructure agents. Customers upload their own documentation.
System Access is a consideration in the Making
The detachment of integrations does not come without its disadvantages: someone must manually collect evidence.
The application for compliance doesn’t require integration and can be utilized without connection to the operating environment.
The designs of either are not superior to the other. It is important to ask which choices are best for your particular business.
CertAssist targets teams between five and 200 participants. Its pricing is published rather than needing an initial sales call to determine the initial price. The price stated for the launch of CertAssist is $225 a month in comparison to the standard $375.
Let Complexity Take Its Place
The requirements for a start-up that a 10 person company has today might not be the same for 500 or 100 employees.
A lightweight platform can make sense while compliance remains simple. Automation’s cost-effectiveness can rise as the number of employees, systems and frameworks grow. It’s a more efficient way to purchase compliance technology Let complexity earn its rightful place.
Don’t pay for fifty integrations because they appear impressive in a chart of comparison. Pay for them if manually performing the task they replace is the more expensive option.